Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
The influential English author Jane Austen published her romance novel “Pride and Prejudice” in 1813. Elizabeth Bennet, a 20-year-old English woman who is the protagonist of the narrative, must learn to distinguish between the superficial and the necessary as she matures. Elizabeth, her five sisters, and their father reside on the huge Longbourn estate, which will not be passed down to any of their father’s children upon his passing. It is crucial that at least one of the daughters finds a successful marriage in order to support her sisters in later life.
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
2 used from $29.92
Free shipping
Amazon.com
English author Jane Austen (1775–1817) is well known for her novels, which make fun of the upper classes in the 18th century and modern books of sensitivity. Her work helped pave the way for 19th-century literary realism thanks to her use of irony, cutting social commentary, and realism, which has earned her widespread praise from academics and critics. This author is well known for the novels “Sense and Sensibility” (1811), “Emma” (1816), and “Mansfield Park” (1818). (1814). These and other vintage books are getting harder to find and more expensive. This book is being republished right now in a cost-effective, contemporary, high-quality edition with a newly commissioned author biography.
Elizabeth’s personality contrasts with that of the female characters in Shakespeare’s plays; I don’t need Elizabeth to commit suicide to demonstrate her love, but Austen only gives us a stroll in the park to accomplish the same thing. Her character fails to elicit any strong emotional response from the reader since she is uncomplicated, unchanging in personality, and inadequately presented. As a result, the reader never feels emotionally invested in the book. By extension, the plot can also be described as distant and removed, giving the critical reader a scanty and utterly inadequate feeling of the overall experience. The storyline, and consequently the theme, are simple: while young people experience romance, they must manage politics and tradition.
One can debate the depth and complexity of that romance, but I don’t think a lady revising her “initial impression”—the work’s original title—of a man is all that exciting. The incorrect initial impression never really comes across as a deficiency in character that needs to be changed; rather, it ends up being justified as an entirely honest, logical, and faultless assessment. In this perspective, Elizabeth is entirely uninteresting: she lacks any “philosophical” subtleties that may suggest a noteworthy level of enlightened cognition beyond ideology in relation to marriage and other amorous subjects.
She undoubtedly possesses a disposition that suggests that she might extend her rational personality to areas other than romance, but Austen only “condescends” to portray Elizabeth’s logical character in these contexts. Elizabeth is no longer a representation of the intellectual liberation of women but rather of the naive and meaningless character of female brilliance. High regard for logic does not endow Elizabeth with any real power over either Darcy or her station in life, and it certainly does not endow her with the ability to achieve anything beyond the honour of being married to a man whose own logical sensibilities afford him much in both objective and real terms.
Darcy tries to convince Elizabeth, and by extension, the reader, that Elizabeth’s initial rejection of him changed his character. Though Austen makes every effort to prove otherwise, it does not in fact. His belief that he can control Elizabeth by being less covert about the character he already possesses is only strengthened by her straightforward rejection of him. Hence, he too has no inherent problems that he must overcome to win her, and he doesn’t really change as a person other than to be less secretive.
